29412

Professor Paul BillinghamBack to People

Paul-Billingham
Subjects: Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Politics and Economics
Department: Politics and International Relations
College appointment: Tutorial Fellow
Academic position: Associate Professor of Political Theory
Phone: 01865 276015

Background

I came to Magdalen in 2018 from Christ Church, Oxford, where I was a Junior Research Fellow from 2015-2018. Prior to this, I studied for my BA in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics at Queen’s College, Oxford, my MPhil in Politics: Political Theory at Lincoln College, Oxford, and my DPhil in Political Theory at St Anne’s College, Oxford.

Teaching

I teach various courses in political theory, including Introduction to the Theory of Politics (first year paper), Theory of Politics (finals paper), and the Advanced Paper in Theories of Justice (finals paper).

Research

Most of my research has been on debates concerning public justification and public reason: what kinds of reasons of values should be used to justify political institutions and laws, in the face of our many moral, philosophical, and religious disagreements? I have explored competing accounts of public justification and examined the implications of theories of public reason for religious citizens, and the compatibility of the view with Christianity, in particular. This has included interacting with the work of theologians.

My current work considers how the liberal state ought to respond to citizens – and especially religious groups – whose beliefs and practices do not seem to cohere with liberal values. Should the state actively confront, and seek to transform, the views of such citizens? On the other hand, should the law protect the autonomy of religious groups, including by granting them exemptions, even when this allows them to engage in illiberal practices?

Finally, I am also writing on the use of the Internet, particularly social media, to criticise (perceived or actual) moral failures and misdemeanours. Under what conditions can this so-called ‘online public shaming’ be justified? And what are the responsibilities of the state, social media organisations, and the public, in response to cases of unjustified or disproportionate shaming?

Selected Publications

For a full list of publications see my website.

‘Exemptions for Religious Groups and the Problem of Internal Dissent’, in John Adenitire (ed.), Religious Beliefs and Conscientious Exemptions in a Liberal State (Hart Publishing, 2019), pp. 51-69.

‘State Speech as a Response to Hate Speech: Assessing ‘Transformative Liberalism’’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (online first, doi: 10.1007/s10677-019-10001-1).

‘Consensus, Convergence, Restraint and Religion’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 15(3) (2018): 345-361.

‘Liberal Perfectionism, Moral Integrity, and Self-Respect’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 63(1) (2018): 63-79. (Co-authored with Anthony Taylor.)

‘Public Reason and Religion: The Theo-Ethical Equilibrium Argument for Restraint’, Law and Philosophy, 36(6) (2017): 675-705.

‘Convergence Liberalism and the Problem of Disagreement Concerning Public Justification’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 47(4) (2017): 541-564.

‘How Should Claims for Religious Exemptions be Weighed?’, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 6(1) (2017): 1-23.

‘Does Political Community Require Public Reason? On Lister’s Defence of Political Liberalism’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 15(1) (2016): 20-41